Paul Tagliabue: I think so.
Eisen: Oh boy. There's a lot to get to. Let's start with the news
of the day; the announcement that you made today to start things off.
And that is the big four games that are on the schedule already. And you
announced them, starting with the kickoff game in New England in an AFC
title game rematch. Can you talk about this matchup and how this sort of
stuff comes about, that New England gets the kickoff game?
Tagliabue: Well, we try to get both of the Super Bowl teams in
theng weekend in national games. And we felt that the Super Bowl
winner was probably the one who had earned it. And New England would be
a great place in the country at that time of the year to start playing
football. And of course, bringing the Colts back in there, it'd be a big
match, and we thought it was wonderful. And then we go to Monday night,
and we have Brett Favre and
Jake Delhomme, the two Louisiana guys up against each other, so we
think it's a really positive start.
Eisen: Then Sunday night, a big AFC West battle between Denver
and Kansas City in mile high, right there where a lot of additions have
taken place for the Broncos. That should be exciting, with Dallas and
Minnesota, also.
Tagliabue: Dallas and Minnesota. The Vikings made it clear here
today that they thought they should've been in the playoffs, so they're
ready to start off the season as a playoff contender.
Eisen: Let's talk about a couple of issues that are going to be
on the docket. Starting with the NFL Trust, which calls for equal
distribution of marketing and merchandising dollars. There's been a lot
of talk about how important this really is, and the fact that it does
not talk about revenue share and doesn't deal with revenue sharing from
television dollars, is a large chunk. But a lot of people also think
that if it no longer calls for an equitable distribution of the
marketing dollars that could lead to a slippery slope of signing
bonuses, etc. Where do you feel this issue falls in the level of
importance?
Tagliabue: Well, I think it's more important as a promotional set
of arrangements as a way for teams in their markets to build
partnerships with local businesses and companies and employees of
companies with sponsorships and things like that. At the league level,
it's very important with our Gatorade relationship, our Pepsi
relationship and some of our youth programs that some of those sponsors
will invest in. So it's important, mostly for those promotional reasons.
Of course, there's some money associated with that. But in the big
financial picture, it's not that big a deal, to put it in simple terms.
Eisen: Okay, let's talk about some of the Competition Committee
issues that have been forwarded by the committee, and that is instant
replay. How do you think this vote is going to turn out, in your mind?
 | |
| Paul Tagliabue is happy that some important rules and regulations were passed. | |
Tagliabue: Well, what I've heard is unusual. There seems to be a
wide consensus on replay, on one system and on making it permanent. For
about 10 years I'd come down here and this was one of the things you'd
have to spend about two hours to figure out what all the options and how
you were going to sequence them. When I met with the committee on
Saturday, they were pretty clear that they think there's a consensus.
Not only as reflected in the committee's vote but throughout the league.
And I think it's attributed to the way replay's been working. The fans,
of course, have always liked it. And it seems like we've struck a good
balance in terms of the coaches, the players and the competition on the
field.
Eisen: When is that vote going to come down, do we know?
Tagliabue: Probably (March 30), it could be late morning, early
afternoon.
Eisen: Competition Committee also calls for a 15-yard penalty on
celebrations that a referee deems as a group premeditated celebration.
Where do you think a vote on this matter is going to fall?
Tagliabue: I think it'll pass. I think the coaches, in
particular, are fed up with things that they regard as outside the
bounds of the game. The Players Association's been the leader on this
issue. It goes back four or five years; we put fines in, four or five
years ago, maybe three years ago. Now, when we spoke to the Players
Association at the combine, they were on board on getting this out of
the game. It sends a powerful message to our fans and to young football
players.
Eisen: And I'm told the Chiefs have tabled their proposal to add
playoff teams, so that's not going to be up for a vote here this time
around?
Tagliabue: Yes. It will not be up for a vote. We discussed it at
some length last year and there really was lukewarm support at that
time. And this year, the playoffs were so great, why tinker with
something when it gives you the best playoffs, perhaps in the history of
the league?
Eisen: And perhaps the same idea can be said for overtime format
change. But that is still going forward. The Chiefs' idea of allowing
each team to touch the football at least once in overtime. That's going
to go forward, in terms for a vote?
Tagliabue: It will go forward to discussion. It's the type of
thing that before we get through with it that may be tabled as well. But
there again, we had so many games where both teams had their hands on
the ball. Of course, we had the double overtime game in the playoffs.
So, some of the edginess of that debate has gone by the boards as well.
Eisen: The Collective Bargaining Agreement between the union and
the league, where does that stand? I know that you were mentioning in
your speech about moving forward and getting this extended.
Tagliabue: We're working on it very hard. We've had a number of
meetings with Gene Upshaw, some larger meetings, some small meetings.
He's with his players this week at their convention out in Hawaii. We're
going to be meeting in mid-April when he gets back, and we just want to
keep it moving along. Our goal is to put something together that could
be presented to the players for a vote this fall, perhaps late in the
season.
Eisen: Thanks for coming on the show.